View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Shevek LifeTime Member
Age: 48 Zodiac: Joined: 23 Mar 2007 Posts: 333 Location: New Barn, Kent
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 11:59 Post subject: Identify your Pajero plus Pajero models overview ... |
|
|
Not sure if this is the right forum to post this in but after recent confusions of Series / Generations / Marks of Paj and Shogun I have put together a timeline (for download) which may (or may not ) help you
Click HERE to download the Pajero Timeline.
Pajero models overview :
Mitsubishi Pajero Mk1
Production 1982–1991
Engine(s) 3.0 L 143 hp (107 kW) V6
2.6 L 109 hp (81 kW) I4
2.0 TD I4
2.3 D I4
2.3 TD I4
2.5 TD I4
Transmission(s) 4-speed automatic
5-speed manual
Wheelbase 2,695 mm (106.1 in) (LWB)
2,350 mm (92.5 in) (SWB)
Length 4,650 mm (183.1 in) (LWB)
3,995 mm (157.3 in) (SWB)
Width 1,680 mm (66.1 in)
Height 1,890 mm (74.4 in) (LWB)
1,850 mm (72.8 in) (SWB)
Fuel capacity 90 L (19.8 imp gal; 23.8 US gal) (LWB)
60 L (13.2 imp gal; 15.9 US gal) (SWB)
Mitsubishi Pajero Mk2
Production 1991–1999
Engine(s) 4D56 2.5 TD
4M40 2.8L TD
4G64 2.4L I4
6G72 3.0L V6
6G74 3.5 V6
Transmission(s) 5-speed manual
4-speed auto
Wheelbase 2,725 mm (107.3 in) (LWB)
2,420 mm (95.3 in) (SWB)
Length 4,705 mm (185.2 in) (LWB)
4,030 mm (158.7 in) (SWB)
Width 1,695 mm (66.7 in)
Height 1,875 mm (73.8 in) (LWB)
1,850 mm (72.8 in) (SWB)
Fuel capacity 90 L (19.8 imp gal; 23.8 US gal) (LWB)
75 L (16.5 imp gal; 19.8 US gal) (SWB)
Mitsubishi Pajero Mk3
Production 1999–2006
Engine(s) 4D56 2.5 TD
4M41 3.2 Di-D
6G72 3.0 V6
6G74 3.5 V6
6G74 3.5 V6 GDI
6G75 3.8 V6
Transmission(s) 5-speed manual
4-speed auto
5-speed auto
Wheelbase 2,780 mm (109.4 in) (LWB)
2,545 mm (100.2 in) (SWB)
Length 4,800 mm (189.0 in) (LWB)
4,220 mm (166.1 in) (SWB)
Width 1,875 mm (73.8 in)
Height 1,855 mm (73.0 in) (LWB)
1,845 mm (72.6 in)(SWB)
Fuel capacity 89 L (19.6 imp gal; 23.5 US gal) (LWB)
71 L (15.6 imp gal; 18.8 US gal) (SWB)
Mitsubishi Pajero Mk4
Production 2006–current
Engine(s) 4M41 3.2 Di-D
6G72 3.0 V6
6G75 3.8 V6
Transmission(s) 5-speed manual
4-speed auto
5-speed auto
Wheelbase 2,780 mm (109.4 in) (LWB)
2,545 mm (100.2 in) (SWB)
Length 4,900 mm (192.9 in) (LWB)
4,385 mm (172.6 in) (SWB)
Width 1,875 mm (73.8 in)
Height 1,900 mm (74.8 in) (LWB)
1,880 mm (74.0 in) (SWB)
Fuel capacity 89 L (19.6 imp gal; 23.5 US gal)
-------------------------------------
Have fun! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Google Sponsor
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 11:59 Post subject: Google Ads keep the POCUK free to join! |
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mark dale Site Admin
Age: 55 Zodiac: Joined: 04 Mar 2003 Posts: 5059 Location: Settle, Yorkshire Dales
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:46 Post subject: |
|
|
very good
thank you
mark " mark2" dale |
|
Back to top |
|
|
joella *****
Joined: 19 Mar 2008 Posts: 769 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 13:25 Post subject: |
|
|
very good thanks for that.
Assuming all your data is correct (which i'm sure it is) it is worth noting that some models may have upgraded optionals fitted, so may not match your descriptions completely.
For example, mine is a Series 2 Mark2, so I assume the digital compass I have, was selected as an optional extra, or was fitted at a later date.
Cheers
Joel |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Shevek LifeTime Member
Age: 48 Zodiac: Joined: 23 Mar 2007 Posts: 333 Location: New Barn, Kent
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 13:35 Post subject: |
|
|
joella wrote: |
very good thanks for that.
Assuming all your data is correct (which i'm sure it is) it is worth noting that some models may have upgraded optionals fitted, so may not match your descriptions completely.
For example, mine is a Series 2 Mark2, so I assume the digital compass I have, was selected as an optional extra, or was fitted at a later date.
Cheers
Joel |
Good point... I'll add a disclaimer in it. Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Polly LifeTime Member
Joined: 13 Sep 2004 Posts: 215 Location: Lincolnshire
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 21:52 Post subject: |
|
|
I have a 1990 SWB MKl Pajero with a 2.5 non-turbo engine. You haven't mentioned that one
Polly |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Shevek LifeTime Member
Age: 48 Zodiac: Joined: 23 Mar 2007 Posts: 333 Location: New Barn, Kent
|
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:19 Post subject: |
|
|
Polly wrote: |
I have a 1990 SWB MKl Pajero with a 2.5 non-turbo engine. You haven't mentioned that one
Polly |
I think that's covered by the disclaimer |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NeilD Newbie
Joined: 31 Jul 2010 Posts: 7 Location: Between Milton Keynes and Harare
|
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 21:47 Post subject: |
|
|
Often one hears them being refered to as NM,NP,NS,NT etc. I am sure it would be handy if there was this reference in your already handy guide? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pad4 LifeTime Member
Age: 54 Zodiac: Joined: 11 Jul 2010 Posts: 119 Location: Bolton
|
Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 22:26 Post subject: |
|
|
My mk2 has a 5 speed auto box - tip tronic |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vibe666 ****
Age: 47 Zodiac: Joined: 01 Oct 2007 Posts: 443 Location: Co. Meath, Ireland
|
Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 23:38 Post subject: |
|
|
i have a 2.8 mk2 and there's no way it's got a 90L tank on it. maybe there's others out there that do, but i know for sure that mine doesn't.
i've run it down to literally just fumes and actually run out once and have always filled it to the brim of the filler on every fuel stop and never gotten more than 80L of fuel in it in one go. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zulu77 ****
Age: 57 Zodiac: Joined: 21 Aug 2009 Posts: 281 Location: Caribbean
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:41 Post subject: |
|
|
vibe666 wrote: |
i have a 2.8 mk2 and there's no way it's got a 90L tank on it. maybe there's others out there that do, but i know for sure that mine doesn't.
i've run it down to literally just fumes and actually run out once and have always filled it to the brim of the filler on every fuel stop and never gotten more than 80L of fuel in it in one go. |
The tank on the 2.8 is definitely smaller and its capacity is less. The larger tanks are for the 3.5 V6 from what i know. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rob.ie *****
Age: 47 Zodiac: Joined: 08 Jun 2010 Posts: 754 Location: Cork - Ireland
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 12:10 Post subject: |
|
|
Sweet! So our Shogun is only 1855mm high eh?
That means it'll fit under the 1.9m barrier at the toll plaza for paying car rate and not over inflated commercial rate |
|
Back to top |
|
|
REVOGEL LifeTime Member
Age: 84 Zodiac: Joined: 23 Dec 2006 Posts: 4276 Location: Cent. Amelias. Reg 10. Guyana South America
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 12:25 Post subject: |
|
|
Unless you have larger wheels/ tyres than standard, Or the winter pack, that includes a 2" body lift OUCH |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rob.ie *****
Age: 47 Zodiac: Joined: 08 Jun 2010 Posts: 754 Location: Cork - Ireland
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 12:28 Post subject: |
|
|
No body lift and running standard(ish) 265/65/17's |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Elegance 3.2 ***
Age: 66 Zodiac: Joined: 11 Nov 2010 Posts: 158 Location: North Lincolnshire
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:48 Post subject: |
|
|
vibe666 wrote: |
i have a 2.8 mk2 and there's no way it's got a 90L tank on it. maybe there's others out there that do, but i know for sure that mine doesn't.
i've run it down to literally just fumes and actually run out once and have always filled it to the brim of the filler on every fuel stop and never gotten more than 80L of fuel in it in one go. |
My Mate took my Fuel Tank off because it had been belted from u/neath , he changed it for the smaller of the two mentioned but also told me that the tank was a bad design because there was at least a gallon if fuel left in the bashed up tank and he said that there was No Way that this fuel was EVER going to come out and that the way the baffles are situated during construction that this gallon or more would never be able to be used, so betweenThe pick up pipe and the baffling of the tank there was a mistake made during the construction..... this is what he found out so maybe that those missing litres are hidden in the void of the tank where No fuel once put in will never come out again.
Oh! and my vehicle is a SWB Mk2 Paj 2.5 auto J reg
Eleg. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pajpaj *
Age: 56 Zodiac: Joined: 19 Dec 2009 Posts: 14 Location: Kentford, Suffolk
|
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 20:02 Post subject: |
|
|
Zulu77 wrote: |
vibe666 wrote: |
i have a 2.8 mk2 and there's no way it's got a 90L tank on it. maybe there's others out there that do, but i know for sure that mine doesn't.
i've run it down to literally just fumes and actually run out once and have always filled it to the brim of the filler on every fuel stop and never gotten more than 80L of fuel in it in one go. |
The tank on the 2.8 is definitely smaller and its capacity is less. The larger tanks are for the 3.5 V6 from what i know. |
Very strange! My 2.8 LWB has 92L tank |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|